
Is it just me or did Kruschev, as succeeding Secretary General, go about removing all statues, busts and images of Stalin as one of his first acts? All with overwhelming Party support they even went so far as to remove his body from the same tomb as Lenin's.
Look, I understand the idea of properly acknowledging history, accurately. But come on! A "bust" has a particular social connotation. I'm not saying scrub Stalin from our history books, quite the contrary. But a bust is an honorary emblem. If they sought to honor Russia's sacrifice then a bust of a Russian soldier, a Russian Jew, or Vasilly perhaps would have been appropriate in my estimation. I doubt Churchill would of approved of Stalin's mug right next to his own.
And what makes this particularly "non sequitorious" is this is a D-DAY memorial, the remarkable opening operation of the Western Front! I heard a professor, whom helped arrange this thing, defend the bust (and I paraphrase) as warranted because without Stalin there couldn't have been a D-Day. Do you know how tortured an extrapolation that is? I understand he tied up German forces in the Motherland, and that he demanded a Western front at Tehran, FINE. But there also "wouldn't of been a D-Day" without Adolf Hitler!
Please allow my own tortured extrapolation - this is where cycle and hammer tees get you. Where belts in trendy mall clothing stores with the face of Mao, Che and Stalin on them lead you.
It's utterly ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment