No argument...

I'm in full agreement that Perot cost Bush that election... always have been.  And you are right, he didn't win the "more-than-50%" that perhaps my previous post suggested... Clinton only carried 43% to Bush's 37.5%

My point was simply that Bush failed where Reagan succeeded (even when Ron did compromise and raise taxes, he made it SEEM like he wasn't... Bush just made promises he couldn't keep).