sigh, sigh, sigh . . .

. . . that's all you do! Sobbing like so much the injured little school girl, complete with the pink bow and plaid patterned skirt.

Look, panty man - face it: you are considered, in 2009, a rabid - and I mean RABID - right winger, I don't give a damn what letter begins your political party affiliation. Partly because of your own new conclusions on certain issues, and because the party of your youth has gone friggin-A bonkers. Lets also note that I have always been a conservative myself - albeit I am a much more mature one (in argument and self) now then was present in the Grand dice pit and on the back dock circa 2002. And with the election of the most left wing candidate in US history (William Jennings Bryant would have been preferable at this point) causing the convergence of monetary, social and defense policy into a single quasi-socialist (not to mention amateur & just flat out historically ignorant) voice booming from D.C, OF COURSE we find less and less to disagree on within current events.

So ... what's left? History. You have always been "skeptical" (as you've described it) of Regan's tax policy. Assuming that you still are, and with us all acknowledging he is a "top 5" US president, explain to me just how the largest tax receipts and fastest expansion of prosperity in the history of the US leaves room for "skepticism" from an enlightened fellow such as yourself.

Or pick another facet of history . . . or lets finish the "Presidential Report Cards." FDR and Clinton may prove particularly fractious here.

At any rate, stop whining - ACT!