Monday, September 10, 2007

Installment #1

Of FR's campaign for the White House. Something I like to call "Spank Rudy!"

And by the way? This is cut from the old mailing list... So the profanity is basicly intact. Just a little note at the top for the sensitive among us.

New Deal 2008

In light of the complete lack of identity in the 21st Century incarnation of the Democratic Party, my answer to the lack of opposition to the current incarnation of “Conservative” Republican trends is Ryan’s New Deal. Calling any democrat an advocate of BIG GOVERNMENT, especially by a Reagan Apostle as yourself, is like Whoopie Goldberg calling the Rutgers basketball team nappie headed hoes. As we've documented numerous times, Reagan did nothing to reduce government. The size of the government isn't determined by tax income, it's determined by spending. The more the beast is fed, the larger it gets. Cut spending and you get small government. We have to go to Hoover before we see a Republican that chokes the beast into something nearly unrecognizable in the last half of the 20th century.

Now, lets spend some money.

And this is a minor side-note. The f**king of big business is just an added benefit. No one wants to break it off inside Exxon and the rest of those gougers more than me, but that does not necessarily represent a party or an ideological platform. That part is pure entertainment.

1) The cessation of the importation of all petroleum in four years.

In large agrarian states, (Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Alabama, you get it) federal refineries are constructed for the production of ethanol. I do not know how long this takes, (to build the building, you get it...) but if they can throw Hoover Dam up in three years I'm thinking we can build the twenty or so refineries needed. Being federal, we have an advantage with OSHA and EPA and all that. This shit gets done no red tape. Fast. As many people working balls to the wall as possible. We're spending money, we're spending it well.
All farm subsidies stop. I'm not paying any money for good land to stay fallow. I want as much farmland we have as possible (without starving the nation, I'm not Stalin, for crying out loud) used. I want some Joe Blow 19 year old with no college education able to buy the forty acres next to his dad's 40 and farm just like their family has done forever. If that's corn, wheat, saw grass, sugar cane, sugar beats, whatever. Don't care. Because we (the feds) are buying. What determines the price? I don't know, not an economics major. The market value for the product would be more than made up if the ethanol sells for HALF of what gas goes for now. So at 1.50 a gallon the feds can pay the farmers what they deserve. And that will only get better as demand increases. I can tell you, lots of things need fuel and in four years we're going to be self-sufficient. All those planes need gas. Trucks need bio-diesel. The demand for product to be refined into ethanol should allow anyone who has an interest and a desire to farm to be able to make that kind of a living. All of a sudden Kansas is a nice place to live again.

NOTE: Any wiener can pop a couple of holes in this, but what's GOOD about it? It appeals to Heartland mentality. It appeals to farming, country, patriotism, Midwestern values, the heart of American conservatism. And let's face it. If you acknowledge Titus’ position that Hoover and not Reagan is the 20th century's torchbearer for conservatism, then Iowa really is heaven. In one bold stroke we've done three things.
A) Created agrarian jobs. Name the last President to do that? (Jefferson. Go west.)
B) Created guaranteed jobs that'll last a century. John farms the corn. Mike hauls the corn. Suzie works to refine the corn. And Peter pumps the gas.
C) Cut the legs out of not only the Arabs, the Venezuelans, and some other oil rich state, but companies like Exxon and Mobile and those cornshuckers charging me 3+ a gallon.

2 comments:

Titus said...

While this plan (or as much as we have seen of it) is rock solid, and an order of magnitude more than we have seen or heard from the Dems concerning the Run in ‘08, I have some thoughts… but not problems.

Your plan utilizes existing infrastructure in transportation and distribution of ethyl alcohol- based fuels, thus making for a much easier and less costly conversion to a petroleum-free future… but does it sell short the possibility of other, even more cost effective future fuels like hydrogen fuel cells? Hydrogen has NO emissions and no residual pollutants (making it very appealing to the “green” faction), it is relatively cheap to produce (at least on par with bio-diesel production), and it is no more dangerous a fuel product than high-octane gasoline. The biggest drawback to hydrogen is not production, it is distribution of the final product. How many gas stations in the country would need to be completely over-hauled to accommodate the new fuel? This makes for an additional head ache in that existing cars and technology will need access to gasoline and diesel for years to come, and NEW stations might not want to burden themselves with the cost of TWO separate tanks, pumps and tools for both petroleum and hydrogen fuels.

When is it going to become important for this nation to take the initiative and lead the world into the inconceivably profitable realm of alternative non-petroleum fuel production, the same way we led the world in oil, gas and electricity? Let’s not forget that Menlo Park was electrified while large portions of Canada were still lit by sperm whale oil!

T

Jambo said...

As a New Deal FR campaigner, it is my official position that the environment is NOT a primary concern. Installment #1 deals with A) The creation of aggrarian jobs.
B) The national security threat that foreign oil represents.
C) Screwing unscrupulous oil companies and nations.

As for the creation of a distribution system for hydrogen cars, the key is not government planning but private enterprise. And someone is going to make enough money off the deal to make Bill Gates look like a hobo. One would think that American car companies like Ford, Chrysler and GM would be jumping on this with both feet, as they can't compete with traditional (and foreign subsidized) imported cars.