The president was all over supporting the Egyptian uprising, yet the Iranian & Libyan revolts get a luke warm response (he hasnt even mentioned Qaddafi by name, how many times did we hear the name "Mubarak?").
Similarly, the PoTUS expresses support for the multitudes protesting in WI, OH et al. Yet the Tea Party, thats a hate group and something he barely acknowledges.
Im curious as to what his barometer is for measuring the validity of these groups whom "speak truth to power." The Tea Party paradigm is one thing, it directly opposes his domestic agenda; but what formula is he using when deciding which Mid Eastern revolution to throw the considerable weight of the White House behind? Because it CLEARLY isn't consistent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment